Carrot White Paper
Back to Carrot Website ▶
  • CARROT NETWORK
  • documentation
    • Introduction
      • Recycling Systems Are Broken
      • Earth Limitations
      • From Linear to Circular
      • What is Zero Waste?
      • Extended Producer Responsibility
      • Carbon Markets: From Problem to Solution
      • Greenwash & ESG
      • Solution
    • The Product
      • Carrot Network
        • Creating Value
        • dMRV
        • Creating a Market
        • Demand-Side Market
        • Atomic Network
        • Methodology Creators
        • Ownership
        • Summary Diagram
      • Recycling Supply Chain
        • Reaching the Source of Waste Creation
        • Participants
        • Validators & SOs
        • Local vs Long Hauling
      • MassIDs: Codifying Waste
        • Participant Categories and Wallets
        • MassID Composition
        • MassID Notation
        • MassID Creation
        • MassID Splits
        • Waste Validation & Audits
        • Proof-of-Authority
        • Proof-of-Work & Provenance
      • Recycling Tokens
        • Minting TRCs
        • TCC (Carbon Credits)
          • GasID Creation
          • GasID Notation
          • Minting TCCs
          • Calculating GasIDs
          • GasIDs from Composting
          • TCCs from Composting
        • Carrot Registry (EPR/ESG)
        • $CARROT Distribution Model
          • Waste Source Not Identified
        • Carbon Credit Tokens from Composting
      • Tokenomics
        • Supply and Demand
        • AMM & LPs
        • $CARROT Stablecoins/Fiat
        • Burn-As-A-Service
        • Lending & Forwards
        • Carrot Ecosystem Fees
        • Carrot Incentive Mechanism
        • Tokenomics Conclusion
      • Value Proposition
        • Network Integrators
        • Producers (Credit Buyers)
        • Recyclers, Haulers & Processors
        • Waste Generators
        • Bin Custodians
        • State and Federal
        • Municipalities
        • Fund Managers
        • NGOs & Donors
        • Partners
        • External Service Providers (ESPs)
      • Closing the Loop
        • Proof-of-Recycled-Content
        • Product Composition
        • Local Recyclability
      • Product Roadmap
        • Product Decentralization
        • Protocol Selection
    • Governance
      • Carrot DAO
        • $CARROT Token Governance
        • Carrot Improvement Proposal Process
        • Carrot DAO Maintenance and Processes
        • Carrot Retroactive Funding
      • Progressive Decentralization
        • Incentives for Participation
        • 3 Phases of Decentralization
      • Security
        • Community Values
        • Community Guidelines
        • Holder Reputational System
    • The Carrot Foundation
      • Mission
      • Goals
      • Vision
      • $CARROT Allocation
      • $CARROT Supply
      • Treasury Reserve
      • Wallet Onboarding
      • The Genesis Team
      • Community Fund
      • Launch Strategy
      • NFT Auctions w/ Options
      • Stewards & Board
      • Advisors
      • Founders
    • Conclusion
      • Acknowledgements
    • Appendix
      • Formula comparison Between TRCs And TCCs
      • Formula for Project and Leakage Emissions From Composting
      • Formula For Baseline Emissions of CO2
      • CWIP Process (Extended)
      • Generating Reputational Metrics
      • Applying Reputational Metrics
      • Holder Reputational System Token Implementation
  • Carrot Methodologies
    • Glossary
    • Rewards Distribution Policy
    • BOLD Recycling Credit
    • BOLD Carbon (CH4)
  • More
    • Terms & Conditions
      • T&C of Use
      • T&C for Sales and Purchases of TRCs and TCCs
    • Download White Paper
  • Connect With Us
    • Website
    • Discord
    • E-mail Carrot Team
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. documentation
  2. The Product
  3. Recycling Tokens
  4. TCC (Carbon Credits)

GasIDs from Composting

PreviousCalculating GasIDsNextTCCs from Composting

Last updated 1 year ago

Diverting food waste and green waste from landfills to composting facilities is a critical strategic initiative for reducing GHG emissions globally. For a comprehensive overview of the importance of composting to climate change, closing the loop on the carbon cycle, and its contribution to the quest for reaching global Zero Waste, see section.

Calculating the avoided emissions (AE) from composting requires that we add an additional layer of understanding to the basic formula described in the section. Because the work of composting involves mixing together different biowaste mass types (e.g. food waste and green waste) it is necessary to combine TRCs for each mass type in order to calculate the actual greenhouse gas emissions that were avoided. A composting mix ratio is determined for each mass type utilized at each composting facility in accordance with actual verified application on site. Because greenhouse gas emissions are not a linear relationship for composting mixes it is important to ensure this is properly measured.

As an example, a composting facility in San Francisco might use a 60% food-waste and 40% green-waste ratio, or (6/4), while another in Munich might use a 55% food-waste and 45% green-waste ratio, or (11/9) for its average composting mix. In order to calculate the GasIDs generated, TRCs are combined in accordance with the composting ratio of each facility. So for the examples above, the composting facility in San Francisco will combine 6 TRCs of food-waste and 4 TRCs of green-waste to calculate a GasID. And, for the facility in Munich the Carrot Fndn will wait until 11 food-waste TRCs and 9 green-waste TRCs are available before a GasID can be created. Establishing the right ratio of food-waste to green-waste is necessary to calculate the GHG emissions for the baseline (BE) and the real emissions (RE) of the facility.

where..where.. where..
AE is the Total Avoided Emissions of GHGs from recycling mass(m)AE \: is\: the \: Total \: Avoided \: Emissions \: of\: GHGs \: from \: recycling \: mass (m) AEistheTotalAvoidedEmissionsofGHGsfromrecyclingmass(m)
BE is the Baseline Emissions of GHGs for when mass (m) is not recycledBE \: is\: the \: Baseline \: Emissions\: of \: GHGs\: for \: when \: mass\: (m)\: is\: not \:recycledBEistheBaselineEmissionsofGHGsforwhenmass(m)isnotrecycled
RE is the Real Emissions of GHGs from mass (m) when successfully recycledRE \: is \: the \: Real \: Emissions \: of\: GHGs\: from \: mass\: (m) \: when \: successfully \: recycledREistheRealEmissionsofGHGsfrommass(m)whensuccessfullyrecycled
AE=BE−REAE =BE-REAE=BE−RE

In addition to requiring a ratio of Food Waste to Green Waste, this equation specifies constants for three distinct baseline scenarios depending on where the waste would have been disposed:

  • Landfill without methane burning,

  • Landfill with methane burning (flaring,) or,

  • Dump site.

For better understanding of the equations below, let’s use an example where a Brazilian composting facility in Rio de Janeiro’s municipality #1 utilizes the ideal ratio of 50/50 food-waste to green-waste in its composting mix. In this case, 1 TRC of food (TrRJ1−food)(Tr_RJ1-food)(TrR​J1−food) representing 1 ton of Food Waste and 1 TRC of green waste (TrRJ1−green)(Tr_RJ1-green)(TrR​J1−green) representing 1 ton of Green Waste is packaged to calculate the GHGs emissions avoided of 2 tons of composted biowaste with a 50/50 ratio.

TrRJ1−food=M0,M1,...,MN, where the mass type (m) isfood–wasteTr_RJ1-food={M_0,M_1,...,M_N},\:where \:the \:mass\: type\: (m)\: is food–waste TrR​J1−food=M0​,M1​,...,MN​,wherethemasstype(m)isfood–waste
TrRJ1−green=M0,M1,...,MN,where the mass type (m) is green–wasteTr_RJ1-green={M_0,M_1,...,M_N},where\: the \:mass\: type\: (m)\: is \:green–waste TrR​J1−green=M0​,M1​,...,MN​,wherethemasstype(m)isgreen–waste

Next, let’s define the baseline emissions (BE) for food and green waste composted at this facility. Let’s assume that in this region if the composted waste mass in the TRCs wasn’t composted it would have been disposed of through Scenario 1 (“Landfill without methane burning”). With this knowledge, the UNFCCC’s Baseline Emissions (BE) equation informs us that 2.451 tons of CO2 would have been emitted. In this case,

where..where.. where..
BE is the Baseline Emissions of GHGs for when mass (m) is not recycledBE \: is\: the \:Baseline \:Emissions \:of \:GHGs \:for\: when \:mass\: (m) \:is \:not \:recycledBEistheBaselineEmissionsofGHGsforwhenmass(m)isnotrecycled
BE=2.451 tonsBE=2.451 \: tonsBE=2.451tons

Project and leakage emissions from composting (PE) shown in the equation above is utilized by the Carrot Fndn to determine the Real Emissions (RE) from composting at Rio’s facility. Continuing with the example, the equation reveals that after composting the food waste and green waste from the TRCs (TrRJ1−food)(Tr_RJ1-food)(TrR​J1−food) and (TrRJ1−green)(Tr_RJ1-green)(TrR​J1−green), the CO2 emissions would be 0.218 tons.

where..where.. where..
RE is the Real Emissions of GHGs from mass (m) when successfully recycledRE \: is\: the\: Real \:Emissions\: of\: GHGs \:from\: mass\: (m) \:when \:successfully \: recycledREistheRealEmissionsofGHGsfrommass(m)whensuccessfullyrecycled
RE=0.218 tonsRE=0.218 \:tonsRE=0.218tons

Now, the actual emissions (AE) can be calculated as follows:

where..where..where..
AE=BE−REAE =BE-REAE=BE−RE
AE=2.451tons−0.218 tonsAE =2.451 tons-0.218 \:tonsAE=2.451tons−0.218tons
AE=2.233 tons=2,233 kgsAE =2.233\: tons=2,233 \:kgsAE=2.233tons=2,233kgs
and as previously definedand \:as\: previously \:definedandaspreviouslydefined
where...where...where...
w is the weight (kg) of Total Avoided GHGs (AE) in the form of CO2ew\: is\: the\: weight\: (kg)\: of\: Total\: Avoided \:GHGs \:(AE) \:in \:the \:form \:of \:CO2ewistheweight(kg)ofTotalAvoidedGHGs(AE)intheformofCO2e
w=AEw=AEw=AE
which allows the GasID GRJ1 from Tr(RJ1–food) and Tr(RJ1–green) to be defined aswhich \: allows \: the \: GasID \: G_RJ1 \: from \: Tr_(RJ1–food)\: and \: Tr_(RJ1–green) \: to\: be\: defined\: aswhichallowstheGasIDGR​J1fromTr(​RJ1–food)andTr(​RJ1–green)tobedefinedas
GRJ1={2,233 kgs,{TrRJ1–food),TrRJ1–green}}G_RJ1={\{2,233 \: kgs,{\{Tr_RJ1–food),Tr_RJ1–green\}\}}}GR​J1={2,233kgs,{TrR​J1–food),TrR​J1–green}}

This process is performed every time a food-waste and green-waste TRC combo can be established in accordance with the facility’s composting ratio.

And, like the example in the previous section, the first step to find the avoided emissions (AE) is to find the baseline emissions (BE). The equation mentioned is from the (UNFCCC), specifically the Clean Development Mechanism, TOOL04 for Emissions from Solid Waste Disposal Sites (SWDS).

For a breakdown of the coefficients and constants of this variable see .

However, because the composting facility performed the important work of composting, these GHGs were not emitted. To determine the real emissions (RE) generated at the facility, the Carrot Fndn utilizes the UNFCCC’s CDM , called “Project and leakage emissions from composting”. The equation is as follows:

For a breakdown of the coefficients and constants of this variable see

Carbon Credits
GasID creation
methodologies from the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
Appendix
AMS-III.F, Tool 13, version 02.0
Appendix