Carrot White Paper
Back to Carrot Website ▶
  • CARROT NETWORK
  • documentation
    • Introduction
      • Recycling Systems Are Broken
      • Earth Limitations
      • From Linear to Circular
      • What is Zero Waste?
      • Extended Producer Responsibility
      • Carbon Markets: From Problem to Solution
      • Greenwash & ESG
      • Solution
    • The Product
      • Carrot Network
        • Creating Value
        • dMRV
        • Creating a Market
        • Demand-Side Market
        • Atomic Network
        • Methodology Creators
        • Ownership
        • Summary Diagram
      • Recycling Supply Chain
        • Reaching the Source of Waste Creation
        • Participants
        • Validators & SOs
        • Local vs Long Hauling
      • MassIDs: Codifying Waste
        • Participant Categories and Wallets
        • MassID Composition
        • MassID Notation
        • MassID Creation
        • MassID Splits
        • Waste Validation & Audits
        • Proof-of-Authority
        • Proof-of-Work & Provenance
      • Recycling Tokens
        • Minting TRCs
        • TCC (Carbon Credits)
          • GasID Creation
          • GasID Notation
          • Minting TCCs
          • Calculating GasIDs
          • GasIDs from Composting
          • TCCs from Composting
        • Carrot Registry (EPR/ESG)
        • $CARROT Distribution Model
          • Waste Source Not Identified
        • Carbon Credit Tokens from Composting
      • Tokenomics
        • Supply and Demand
        • AMM & LPs
        • $CARROT Stablecoins/Fiat
        • Burn-As-A-Service
        • Lending & Forwards
        • Carrot Ecosystem Fees
        • Carrot Incentive Mechanism
        • Tokenomics Conclusion
      • Value Proposition
        • Network Integrators
        • Producers (Credit Buyers)
        • Recyclers, Haulers & Processors
        • Waste Generators
        • Bin Custodians
        • State and Federal
        • Municipalities
        • Fund Managers
        • NGOs & Donors
        • Partners
        • External Service Providers (ESPs)
      • Closing the Loop
        • Proof-of-Recycled-Content
        • Product Composition
        • Local Recyclability
      • Product Roadmap
        • Product Decentralization
        • Protocol Selection
    • Governance
      • Carrot DAO
        • $CARROT Token Governance
        • Carrot Improvement Proposal Process
        • Carrot DAO Maintenance and Processes
        • Carrot Retroactive Funding
      • Progressive Decentralization
        • Incentives for Participation
        • 3 Phases of Decentralization
      • Security
        • Community Values
        • Community Guidelines
        • Holder Reputational System
    • The Carrot Foundation
      • Mission
      • Goals
      • Vision
      • $CARROT Allocation
      • $CARROT Supply
      • Treasury Reserve
      • Wallet Onboarding
      • The Genesis Team
      • Community Fund
      • Launch Strategy
      • NFT Auctions w/ Options
      • Stewards & Board
      • Advisors
      • Founders
    • Conclusion
      • Acknowledgements
    • Appendix
      • Formula comparison Between TRCs And TCCs
      • Formula for Project and Leakage Emissions From Composting
      • Formula For Baseline Emissions of CO2
      • CWIP Process (Extended)
      • Generating Reputational Metrics
      • Applying Reputational Metrics
      • Holder Reputational System Token Implementation
  • Carrot Methodologies
    • Glossary
    • Rewards Distribution Policy
    • BOLD Recycling Credit
    • BOLD Carbon (CH4)
  • More
    • Terms & Conditions
      • T&C of Use
      • T&C for Sales and Purchases of TRCs and TCCs
    • Download White Paper
  • Connect With Us
    • Website
    • Discord
    • E-mail Carrot Team
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. documentation
  2. Appendix

Generating Reputational Metrics

PreviousCWIP Process (Extended)NextApplying Reputational Metrics

Last updated 11 months ago

The function that establishes reputational metrics must remain obscure to deter manipulation. However, certain contributions will be advertized as impactful in order to demonstrate that the process is fair and secure. By revealing these we provide insight into how the system works broadly without revealing its internal workings and the DAO is able to align community resources with members and their proposals that demonstrate the highest scores. Below is a diagram that outlines some possible data inputs.

Figure 53: Possible Reputation Metric Data Inputs

The 4 Reputational Output metrics are:

  1. Participation: The amount the user takes part in governance/token value generation.

  2. Reliability: The quality of the input the user has offered and the consistency with which they are presented.

  3. Community Trust: The user’s involvement in malpractice and the prevention of such.

  4. Overall Reputation: A weighted combination of the three previous elements.

Figure 54: Creation of Overall Reputation Metric